Kentucky Crypto Bill Sparks Concern: Hardware Wallets May Face 'Backdoor' Risk

Kentucky's House Bill 380, a proposed crypto regulation, has raised alarms from the Bitcoin Policy Institute (BPI) over potentially unfeasible requirements for hardware wallets. BPI argues these demands could compromise the security of non-custodial wallets and conflict with the right to self-custody.

A cryptocurrency regulatory draft in Kentucky, known as House Bill 380, has triggered an alert from the Bitcoin Policy Institute (BPI) due to potential new requirements for hardware wallets. The bill was introduced by State Representatives Aaron Thompson and Tom Smith.

Kentucky Crypto Bill Sparks Concern: Hardware Wallets May Face 'Backdoor' Risk插图
Kentucky House Bill 380, which includes proposed requirements for hardware wallet providers. Source: Kentucky Legislature

In its response to the bill, BPI pointed out that the regulations proposed are technically unachievable for non-custodial wallets. They emphasized that hardware wallets are designed precisely to prevent anyone, including the manufacturer, from accessing or recovering a user's seed phrase.

Kentucky Crypto Bill Sparks Concern: Hardware Wallets May Face 'Backdoor' Risk插图1
Source: Bitcoin Policy Institute

Previously, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) officials have publicly defended the right of individuals to self-custody their assets. One official expressed confusion, stating, "What's confusing to me is that in this country of freedom, this is even a question – of course, people can hold their own assets."

0 comment A文章作者 M管理员
    No Comments Yet. Be the first to share what you think
Profile
Search
🇨🇳Chinese🇺🇸English