Anthropic Sues Trump Administration for Abusing ‘Supply Chain Risk’ Label

AI company Anthropic, after refusing the military's misuse of its Claude system, was labeled a ‘supply chain risk’ by the Trump administration, leading to a lawsuit accusing the administration of abusing its power. This case may become a key turning point in U.S. AI regulation and ethical boundaries.

Artificial intelligence company Anthropic, the developer of the AI assistant Claude, has recently filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, accusing it of abusing its administrative power by labeling the company as a ‘supply chain risk’ in retaliation for its refusal to allow the military's excessive use of AI technology. In its complaint, Anthropic emphasized that this move is “unprecedented and unlawful,” and pointed out that the Constitution prohibits the government from using public power to punish companies for exercising their legitimate speech rights. The company stated clearly that Claude has never been tested for the uses required by the U.S. military, especially in scenarios involving lethal autonomous weapon systems, and its safety and reliability cannot be guaranteed. On March 3rd of this year, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth formally placed Anthropic on the “supply chain risk” list, prohibiting any entity doing business with the U.S. Department of Defense from cooperating with it. This is the first time in U.S. history that a domestic technology company has been labeled as such—previously, this label was typically only used for companies associated with foreign adversaries.

Anthropic Sues Trump Administration for Abusing ‘Supply Chain Risk’ Label插图
In addition to the Department of Defense, the lawsuit also names the U.S. Treasury Department and its Secretary Scott Bessent, the State Department and its Secretary Marco Rubio, as well as 17 other federal agencies and officials. Anthropic warns that if this administrative action continues, it will severely weaken the technological competitiveness and industrial innovation vitality of the United States in the field of artificial intelligence, and shake its leadership position in the global AI research and development landscape. The company emphasizes that its position is not to resist defense cooperation, but to adhere to the ethical boundaries of technology and avoid AI being used for military purposes that violate safety principles. This lawsuit may reshape the power boundaries between the government and private AI companies.

0 comment A文章作者 M管理员
    No Comments Yet. Be the first to share what you think
Profile
Search
🇨🇳Chinese🇺🇸English