Hyperliquid Dominates Perp DEX Trading Volume, But Smaller Platforms Excel in Efficiency

Hyperliquid leads the Perp DEX market in trading volume but lags behind some smaller platforms in efficiency scores. This article analyzes the relationship between open interest, total value locked, and trading volume across different platforms.

How Rankings Are Calculated

The ranking score is derived from the average of two ratios: the open interest to total value locked (TVL) ratio, and the seven-day perpetual trading volume to TVL ratio. A higher score indicates that the platform generates more trading activity relative to its capital held, while a lower score suggests that the platform's liquidity base is relatively large compared to the activity it generates. This metric does not measure quality or security, but rather reflects the extent to which each platform's locked capital is effectively utilized.

Hyperliquid Dominates Perp DEX Trading Volume, But Smaller Platforms Excel in Efficiency插图

Ranking Overview

In absolute terms, Hyperliquid ranks first, but it sits at the bottom in terms of score. Its open interest stands at $7.054 billion, while its TVL is $4.7 billion, and the seven-day perpetual trading volume reached $44.725 billion. The activity score of 5.51 is the lowest in the table, reflecting a platform with a liquidity base sufficient to absorb massive trading volumes, yet its ratio does not appear excessively high. Hyperliquid's scale exhibits a self-regulating characteristic in this specific metric. The $44.725 billion seven-day trading volume is more than double that of the next largest platform and over four times Aster's $19.655 billion, but the $4.7 billion TVL keeps the efficiency ratio compressed.

Extended ranks second with an open interest of $324.25 million, a TVL of $195.61 million, and a seven-day trading volume of $2.567 billion, scoring 7.39. CryptoRank notes that Hyperliquid and Extended exhibit the most balanced activity relative to their TVL, indicating a more natural trading liquidity. Extended has raised $6.5 million, the smallest disclosed funding in the list.

Aster ranks third with an open interest of $1.822 billion, a TVL of $932.24 million, and a seven-day trading volume of $19.655 billion, scoring 11.52. The relatively high open interest and trading volume combined with a TVL of less than $1 billion yield a moderate score. Lighter ranks fourth with an open interest of $757.83 million, a TVL of $602.5 million, and a seven-day trading volume of $13.488 billion, scoring 11.83, having secured $68.03 million in funding, the largest disclosed amount in the list.

High-Scoring Platforms

The lower half of the table features those platforms described by CryptoRank as exhibiting stronger activity relative to their liquidity base. GRVT ranks tenth but scores first with a score of 44.50, having an open interest of $489.42 million, a TVL of $113.07 million, and a seven-day trading volume of $9.573 billion. This combination results in a ratio of open interest to trading volume significantly above the table average, indicating a much higher capital utilization efficiency compared to larger platforms.

Pacifica ranks ninth with a score of 38.83, an open interest of $7.389 million, a TVL of $3.598 million, and a seven-day trading volume of $2.72 billion. Reya is in eighth place with a score of 37.87, an open interest of $2.568 million, a TVL of $3.68 million, and a trading volume of $2.761 billion, having secured $19 million in funding. The absolute figures for these two platforms are relatively small,

Hyperliquid Dominates Perp DEX Trading Volume, But Smaller Platforms Excel in Efficiency插图
0 comment A文章作者 M管理员
    No Comments Yet. Be the first to share what you think
Profile
Search
🇨🇳Chinese🇺🇸English